13 Comments

Suppose some product with a quality measure Q.

At one point in time, almost everyone has a product with Q=5. The worlds richest person managed to buy a Q=6 item at absurd price.

Then a new technique comes along, and everyone buys Q=6 products for about what they paid for the previous Q=5 version.

You can say "Q=6 products became a million times cheaper".

But the experience of the common person is that of buying a higher quality product for the same price.

Expand full comment

Great article from Gale. TVs have gotten much better (and cheaper) because of technological improvements. Education, on the other hand, has gotten more expensive. I did a deep dive on this topic some years ago, it is quite evident that government-subsidized loans are the primary factor driving up the cost of education.

When the govt subsidizes something, it will also add regulations. The regs, naturally, favor incumbent players and tend to “lock in” the costly and low-productive nature of the industry.

Expand full comment

Imagine what the price of these large-screen TVs would be today if the government had provided $15,000 loans and grants for young people to buy them? ;)

Expand full comment

Don't forget hiding the actual prices behind a variety of fees, offsets, and variable prices for residents and non-residents :)

Expand full comment

Love this. I would call it a time-price inversion!

Expand full comment

Socialism inverts abundance. Capitalism transforms scarcities into abundance. Socialism transforms abundances into scarcities. Capitalism is Anti-scarcity. ;)

Expand full comment

Brilliant!!! Put the socialist in charge of sand making in the desert. We can end AGW.

Expand full comment

This naturally leads to a discussion of why most products decrease in cost over time, while few do not (particularly health care, education, child care and in some regions housing).

Expand full comment

Governments erect lots of obstacles to new knowledge discovery and sharing: Regulations, subsidies, occupational licensing, accreditation agencies, etc.

Expand full comment

Yes, I think it is a combination of:

1) Strong government interventions in those sectors of the economy (and fewer interventions in the others).

2) Those sectors of the economy are relatively sheltered from foreign competition, while consumer goods have strong foreign competition.

Expand full comment

Agreed. The degree of competition is revealing. A major role of government has been to protect the status quo from competition. Exhibit A: The East German Trabant. Got worse every year from 1957 to 1991. Compare to Porsche, BMW, and Audi.

Expand full comment

Oh, come on!

Who doesn't love the Trabant?

; )

Expand full comment

I would say that we are continually discovering and sharing valuable new knowledge. Capitalism is really about giving people the freedom to create, discover, and share knowledge. As George Gilder has noted "The difference between our age and the Stone Age is entirely due to the growth in knowledge."

Expand full comment