Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Perlot's avatar

Edit: Ooops! I see that Magoon did address some of this in his piece. I'll just leave this here for context.

This is great, and I certainly agree with your general point of increased abundance and affluence. And yes, people refuse to look at the good things and gripe about the problems. But I think it's somewhat disingenuous to not include the main gripes for contextualization, even if you think they're overstated (I know you didn't make this personally, but were just sharing).

For instance, inflation adjusted...

Median home price 1970: $130,000

Median home price 2024: $420,000

4 year university, annually, 1970: $6,700

4 year university, annually, 2024 $26,000

Childcare, 1970: $3,900 (rough estimate, stats are shaky)

Childcare 2024: $15,000

So housing burden 15-20% of income in 1970 to 30-45% of income, 2024

Childcare ~3% – 7% of Household Income 1970 to ~12% – 18% of Household Income 2024

Public College (annual) ~11% of Family Income 1970 to 25% of Family Income 2024

Now the upside of this is that even accounting for this surge in housing prices, the median 1970 family had $45,045 left over after housing costs, and the 2024 family had $52,312.

If you have no kids in childcare or college, that's a big net win, and more to your point of "we're better off.". If you do have kids in childcare or college though, or you need to buy health insurance or pay for care, you're considerably worse off.

Proudfoot Letter's avatar

When looking at the circumstances in which they live, people have a negativity bias. They assume things are worse than they are and they assume things will get worse not better!

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?